The Association of Hearing Loss With Active Music Enjoyment in Hearing Aid Users.

OBJECTIVE: Hearing aids (HAs) are designed for speech rather than music listening. The impact of HAs on music enjoyment is poorly studied. We examine the effect of HAs on active music enjoyment in individuals with varying levels of hearing loss (HL). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary medical center and community. METHODS: Adult (≥18 years) bilateral HA users and normal hearing (NH) controls actively listened to musical stimuli and rated their enjoyment across 3 measures (pleasantness, musicality, naturalness) with and without HAs using a visual analog scale. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the association between HL (measured by a pure-tone average [PTA] and word recognition score [WRS] of the better ear) and music enjoyment with and without HAs, adjusting for covariates. Music enjoyment was compared between HA users and NH controls, and HA users with and without their HAs. RESULTS: One hundred bilateral HA users (mean age 66.0 years, 52% female, better ear mean [SD] PTA 50.2 [13.5] dBHL, mean WRS 84.5 [16.5]%) completed the study. Increasing severity of HL (PTA) was independently associated with decreased music enjoyment (pleasantness, musicality, naturalness) with and without HAs (p < .05). HA usage increased music enjoyment (musicality) in those with moderate to moderately severe HL. Music enjoyment in NH controls (n = 20) was significantly greater across all measures compared to HA users. CONCLUSION: Increased severity of HL is associated with decreased music enjoyment that can be enhanced with HA usage. Thus, HA usage can positively enhance both speech and music appreciation.

Hearing Aids Enhance Music Enjoyment in Individuals With Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate music appreciation in hearing aid (HA) users with varying levels of hearing loss (HL). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, within-subjects design. SETTING: Tertiary medical center, community. PATIENTS: Adults (≥18 yr) bilateral HA users. INTERVENTIONS: HA usage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome variables included self-reported music enjoyment measures (pleasantness, musicality, naturalness) with and without HAs assessed with visual analogue scales (10 indicates highest level of enjoyment, 0 the least). Exposure variables include HL (better ear pure-tone average) and speech discrimination (word recognition scores [WRS]). Demographic information was collected. RESULTS: One hundred nine bilateral HA users completed the study. Mean (standard deviation) age was 66.6 years (16.8 yr); 52.3% were female patients. Mean (standard deviation) better ear pure-tone average was 51.1 dB (16.3 dB) HL. Increased severity of HL and worse WRS were associated with decreased music enjoyment ( p < 0.05) across all measures without HAs, adjusting for sex, age, education, race, HA type, age of HL diagnosis, duration of HL, duration of HA use, musical preference, and musical experience. However, these associations were attenuated or no longer significant with HA usage. Moreover, among all subjects, HAs (vs. no HAs) provided increased music enjoyment in pleasantness (HA, 6.94, no HA, 5.74; p < 0.01), musicality (HA, 7.35; no HA, 6.13, p < 0.01), and naturalness (HA, 6.75; no HA, 6.02; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: HA users report increased music enjoyment with HAs compared with without HAs. Increased severity of HL and worse WRS were independently associated with decreased unaided music enjoyment. HA usage seems to mitigate this effect, particularly for those with worse HL.

Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.

Level-dependent hearing protection devices (HPDs) provide protection from intense sound, while offering amplification for speech and other signals in lower levels of noise. These HPDs have been developed in response to the communication and operational needs of noise-exposed persons in industry and the military. This study was conducted to examine industrial workers' perceptions of the performance of two level-dependent HPDs (one with integrated radio communication capability and one without it) and their customary passive HPDs. This research took place at a plastic film manufacturing plant in Rhode Island, USA, following a mixed-measures design. Fifteen maintenance technicians at the plant evaluated the two level-dependent HPDs, plus their customary passive HPDs, in three separate trial periods. Data were collected via a questionnaire designed for this purpose. Mixed-model analyses of variance were performed on all dependent measures. Linear and quadratic effect sizes were assessed with eta. Results revealed that the two level-dependent HPDs offered better perceived communication and situational awareness than the workers' customary passive HPDs. However, the level-dependent HPDs were rated lower than the passive HPDs in terms of usability and comfort. To increase workers' acceptance of level-dependent HPDs, usability issues must be addressed by the HPD manufacturers.